The Path

"I can only show you the door, you are the one that has to walk through it."

 - Morpheus to Neo in the movie 'The Matrix'

This was an iconic moment from the movie. But unlike movie where Neo had one Morpheus, in the world of investing we are surrounded by many Morpheus. There are whole host of investing schools for a novice investor to follow. Fundamental, quantitative models, technical analysis, value approach, growth approach, finding structural shifts and value migrations, momentum, short term, long term... and the list can be further complicated with mixture of many.

There is always a question of what works the best. The answer to that was aptly put by Howard Marks when he noted that he has seen all type of successful investors so far. Be it value investors, speculators, growth investors or any other type. He is correct. We can see all types of people making money, globally as well as in India. 

So which path to follow? Well, we need to choose a path, walking on which we find most suitable to our character and personality. The path on which you can walk longer as compared to any other path. The beauty is that you can take pavements from different paths and even create your own, and the creation can be an ever evolving process.

Why to do this?

Each human being has a different set of beliefs. The world that he has seen is different. The circumstances that the world has thrown at each person are different. I have known twins who have personalities that are poles apart despite being raised by same parents, attended same school, same college and despite both ended up being Chartered Accountants. One is introvert where as other one is extrovert.

These beliefs are difficult to change as the person grows old. They are hard wired in our brains. These beliefs play a large role in the way we act. This is our nature, our prakruti. And if we are acting against it, we are exposed to higher chances of committing a big mistake over longer term. This is because at some point of time, the animal within will start playing its part. And then the same old story of "anything multiplied by zero, is zero".

First half of this video beautifully explains how our brain is structured.

  

The most important thing in my opinion of creating a path, suitable to your temperament, is that it gives you a longevity in the market. The longer you are able to deploy your ideology in the market, better the rewards can be. Now again, everyone cannot be Warren Buffet or Rakesh Jhunjhunwala or Howard Marks or Damanis. They are outliers. But then we are maximizing our chances of utilizing our capabilities to the fullest and generate returns that are best possible given our temperament.

I am in no way suggesting of sticking to our comfort zone. Learning is a perennial process and it is in our interest to be comfortable with as many types of hunting grounds that can come in our path as possible. We may not be able to change the existing hard wires, but with persistent learning, we can surely create new ones.

Moats

Moat refers to a water body surrounding a castle. It is said that moats surrounding the castles even had predators like crocodiles for extra safety. This moat protects the castle from being attacked.

In investing, the term is made famous by Warren Buffet and refers to characteristics of a business to protect itself from competition. Warren Buffett likes to invest in companies with large moat so that they can survive and are relevant even after 10 years, 15 years or 20 years. The idea is to remove / minimise the business risk while taking investment decisions and not overpay for it so that the inherent compounding in the business can take care of the returns.

The term these days have been made sort of generic. Everyone likes to use this term in their analysis. And the general feeling that I get is that companies with moat are now being considered to have been given a right to survive. Long-term investing in moat companies has become a holy grail for accumulating wealth.

But is it that simple?

Well, yes the answer to this is NO.

All that an "impenetrable" moat provides to the company is time to protect its castle. Presence of it just allows the company to first know that is being attacked, identify the attackers and then formulate strategies to protect itself. By very nature, the moat companies are in advantageous position to defend itself. Wider the moat, more the time company gets to protect itself. To protect itself, companies need to be proactive and act upon it when under attack rather that just relying on moat to defend the castle. Else, sooner or later, crocodiles and sharks in the moat will be killed and the walls will be breached.

Thus in no way there is a writing on the wall that moat companies can survive any catastrophe. By nature, they have been given a chance to protect themselves. But the rules of :Adapt or Perish" still apply to them.

Microsoft, in my opinion has (had?) one of the strongest moat. It has network effect whereby large number of user base and software developers are tied to each other. It has high tangible and intangible costs. Moving to other operating system can be expensive in terms of money as well as time invested. Lots of data resides on its Office suite, making it difficult to migrate. Can spend a large amount on R&D or sales promotion and spread it over millions of units. And of course the intangible in the form of a brand. Kids grow up looking at the Windows logo while starting a PC. It has become generic like Xerox.

Most of us have grown up looking at generations of windows logo while starting our PCs

However, Microsoft' moat has been under attack for some years now. Google and Apple are moving the world towards mobile computing. They have changed the way we use "computers". I am writing this blog on a tablet at 4.30 in the morning and will give a finishing touch tomorrow morning at work. That's the power of internet that these companies are exploiting.

The game is disrupted and first movers have found themselves in an advantageous position. They are changing how the world computes. Microsoft is finding difficult to come out with products that can compete with Google. Future will go to the person that holds and controls maximum (online) data and it is Google's products where maximum amount of online data is generated (and stored).

But Microsoft has recognized this and is thus trying to defend itself. It is trying to get control on the search market by integrating its Bing platform in a lot of ways. It is pushing its Office cloud solutions aggressively. Currently, it is advantage Google (and other online platforms). But will Microsoft be able to get its lost glory? Only time can tell that. As for now, it is struggling to protect its moat (relevance) since mid-2000s.

Anyways, to conclude, having a moat is not something that gives the companies a right to survive over longer term. Risks still exists with these companies as well, though in lesser proportion as compared to others since in case of disruptions, you still may have some time to protect against permanent loss of capital. And of course, valuations is something that shouldn't be overlooked in this case as well since:

A great company need not be a great investment any all points in time.